Nigeria lost an estimated $6 billion as a result of the
Department of Petroleum Resources’ (DPR) poor administration of the
expiring oil blocks, which were sold by the international oil companies
(IOCs) between 2010 and 2015 to local firms, Nigerian exploration and
production (E&P) operators have said.
The Department of Petroleum Resources has also admitted that it was not prepared to develop the necessary guidelines for the asset divestment programme by the IOCs, as the exercise came as a “shock” to the agency, pointing out that it has learnt some lessons for future exercise.
The
Nigerian operators have, however, stated that all hope is not lost, as
the country could earn over $3 billion from the next wave of asset sales
if the Department of Petroleum Resources manages the outstanding onshore oil blocks set to expire
soon properly.
In the first acquisitions by Seplat Petroleum Development Company Plc and First Hydrocarbon Nigeria in 2010, the IOCs raked in $471 million.
The
IOCs were also paid $3.979 billion in the second divestment exercise
between 2011 and 2012 by Eland Oil, Starcrest, Neconde Energy, Heritage
Oil, Shoreline Energy, ND Western and Oando Energy Resources.
Under
the last divestment programme between 2014 and 2015, the IOCs smiled
away with $5.954 billion from Seplat, Erotron E&P, Newcross
Petroleum, Crestar Integrated Natural Resources, Aiteo Group, Taleveras,
Tempo Energy, Belemaoil, West African E&P, and First E&P.
But
speaking in Lagos recently at the maiden edition of the Aspen Energy
Roundtable, the Nigerian independents argued that 60 per cent of the
$10.404 billion paid by the local operators to acquire assets from the
IOCs would have gone into the federal government treasury if the DPR had
better managed the licences covering the divested oil blocks.
In
a keynote speech, the chief executive of Seplat Petroleum Development
Company Plc, Mr. Austin Avuru stated that 70 per cent of the money used
to acquire the assets came from Nigerian banks.
“The
first $471 million was in 2010 and it involved Seplat and OML 26 (First
Hydrocarbon), the second was also $4 billion and the third one, which
was the most recent was almost $6 billion and you can see the
implications of all these.
“So,
if you put all these together, you are talking of over $10 billion in
spend to acquire these assets. They all usually come to about $2 per
probable barrel and about $4-$6 per proven barrel in terms of oil.
“It is not small money and 70 per cent of this money came from Nigerian banks,” Avuru explained.
The
Seplat boss, whose company is listed on both the Nigerian and London
Stock Exchanges, added that 60 per cent of the monies paid to acquire
the assets would have gone into the federal government treasury if the
DPR had handled the lease administration properly.
“That
is another discussion entirely but I can tell you that 60 per cent of
those money would have gone to the DPR if it handled the lease
administration properly.
“But
this is all the money that we, as Nigerian companies using Nigerian
banks, paid to the IOCs and they took the money away. I think that will
be a lesson for the next lease administration and bid rounds and
renewals because if you have a title to these leases, especially leases
that are due to expire and if you don’t take the title, the one who has
the title will sell that title for all of this money,” Avuru explained.
According to Avuru, there were issues in the administration of the country’s oil and
gas resources, which he described as wasting resources, adding that the
country’s resources should be administered to ensure that “maximum value
is captured without expropriation”.
“We
are the victims knocking our heads together and paying three times more
for these leases because we have no option. There are no leases
available. So we knock our heads together and then the IOCs are smiling.
“We could have paid one third of what we paid to the government and everybody will be happy,” Avuru added.
The
Seplat CEO, however, stated that there were still about $12 billion in
assets in the portfolio of IOCs that will be divested, adding that the
federal government could earn over $3 billion if the DPR manages the
licences properly.
“There
are still about $12 billion of the IOCs’ portfolio that could still be
divested, given the right opportunities, depending on how DPR plays it.
“There
could still be $3 billion cash available to DPR, depending on how the
DPR handles the administration of those leases that are due to expire,”
he said.
In
his contributions, the Managing Director of ND Western, which paid $600
million for OML 34, Dr. Layi Fatona, noted that the federal government
did not create the environment for the IOCs to plough back the money
realised from the sale of the assets.
Fatona
also noted that some of the assets were over-priced but exonerated the
IOCs, as the transactions were based on a willing buyer-willing seller
basis.
He blamed the government for not creating the environment for the oil majors to reinvest in the country.
“But
the most important thing is that when you look at the spending, all of
the money came mostly from the Nigerian banking system. And I ask a
pertinent question: should we call this capital flight?
“All
that money that was taken from the Nigerian banking system by
essentially indigenous E&P companies and paid to the IOCs left the
shores of this country?
“How much of this money ended up as a backward reinvestment in the Nigerian petroleum industry?” he asked.
“So
it is not about capital flight, it is about the fact that we have
failed holistically to create the environment where the seller of an
asset who makes a profit believes sufficiently in this society and puts
all the money back into the system,” he said.
In
her response, the Head of Upstream Monitoring and Regulation at DPR,
Pat Maseli admitted that the regulatory agency was not prepared for the
divestment programme at the outset.
“For
the divestments and all that, that came – you know, it came as a shock.
Will I say as a shock – we were not really prepared as regulators to
develop the guidelines.
“But we have learnt our lessons and we are progressing them and making them better,” she said.
She added that the agency had also learnt its lessons in the marginal bid rounds.
“By
the time we have the next bid round, it will be better than the
previous ones, where we had forced marriages and it was not working and
people were just rent seekers. This time, it is going to be different,”
she added.
THIS DAY